Miyerkules, Disyembre 13, 2017

Right to Protection


Right to Protection and Social Security




        Social security is a fundamental human right recognized by most international human rights instruments, reinforced by regional agreements and increasingly reflected in domestic legislation. Encouragingly, requirements to respect, protect and fulfil this right in the design, implementation and evaluation of social protection policies and programmes are affirmed and broadly recognized.


What is the right to Social Security?

Everyone has the right to social security.Through the provision of social welfare or assistance, States must guarantee protection to everyone, particularly the most vulnerable members of society, in the event of unemployment, maternity, accident, illness, disability, old age or other such life circumstances. States must progressively realise the right to social security through measures to offer protection, through cash or in kind, which enables individuals and families to acquire at least essential health care, basic shelter and housing, water and sanitation, food, and the most basic forms of education.
Due to its redistributive effect, the right to social security is an important factor in social inclusion and cohesion, and poverty reduction. Social security must be provided on a non-discriminatory basis, though the means of financing and providing society security will vary from State to State. \

The right to social security is recognized as a human right and establishes the right to social security assistance for those unable to work due to sickness, disability, maternity, employment injury, unemployment or old age. Social security systems provided for by states consist of social insurance programs, which provide earned benefits for workers and their families by employment contributions, and/or social assistance programs which provide non-contributory benefits designed to provide minimum levels of social security to persons unable to access social insurance.


The Universal Declaration of Human Rights recognizes the right to social security in articles 22, which states that:
"Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality."
The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) recognizes that some aspects of  respecting, protecting and fulfilling economic, social and cultural rights may require financial resources that are not always immediately available to all States, and allows for “progressive realization”, meaning the rights may be realized gradually.
This is qualified by expectations that the maximum resources available to the state will be allocated accordingly and that retrogressive measures will not be taken intentionally, as well as other obligations of immediate effect relating to non-discrimination and minimum levels of enjoyment of human rights required to maintain inherent human dignity. In this way, the human rights framework seeks to distinguish between an inability and an unwillingness to meet the agreed responsibilities. Failure to meet the obligations of conduct discussed below may amount to a violation of the obligations assumed by signing the ICESCR.


What is the Human Right to Social Security?

The right to social security ensures that everyone, regardless of age or ability to work, is guaranteed the means necessary to procure basic needs and services. Several key human rights principles are fundamental to guaranteeing the right to social security: 
Comprehensiveness: Social security implicitly covers all the risks involved in the loss of means of subsistence for reasons beyond a person’s control.
Flexibility: The retirement age should be flexible, depending on the occupations performed and the working ability of elderly persons, with due regard to demographic, economic, and social factors.
Non-discrimination: Social security must be provided without discrimination (in intent or effect) based on health status, race, ethnicity, age, sex, sexuality, disability, language, religion, national origin, income, or social status.

               The Right to Social Security is protected by:

The Right to Protection

Discrimination increases the risks of abuse

Discrimination based on sex, social origin, ethnicity or disability is also a major factor in child abuse. Every day, millions of children around the world are discriminated against; innocent victims of humiliating, offensive insults or, worse still, acts of violence. In an incredibly vulnerable state these children have no one to confide in and cannot defend themselves.
Discrimination also gives rise to the exploitation of children. The worst forms of labor are generally forced upon children from minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds.
Such children, often excluded and marginalised, have to contend with indifference and are more likely to be badly treated. Furthermore, children with disabilities, due to their vulnerability, are particularly at risk of physical violence and sexual abuse.

Violence and exploitation against children

Between 500 million and 1.5 billion children are subjected to violence each year. In addition, each year, around 150 million girls and 73 million boys are victims of sexual abuse. The majority of abuse cases take place within the family circle or when the children are victims of child labor exploitation.
Child labor exploitation puts children in the hands of unscrupulous employers who do not hesitate to charge them with extremely difficult and dangerous tasks, involving carrying heavy materials or coming into contact with harmful products. The worst forms of child exploitation similarly expose them to degrading activities such as prostitution and pornography.

The loss of a protective environment

In crisis situations, protective measures are often put on hold. Thus, when armed conflicts and natural catastrophes arise, children do not benefit from a protective environment that guarantees their well-being. They generally suffer from a lack of nutrition, water or essential care.
Furthermore, emergency situations force adults to concentrate on resolving the crisis, and the children’s needs are subsequently neglected. As a result, children feel less secure and more vulnerable to violence and the various forms of exploitation.


Interventions to Protect Human Rights

To protect human rights is to ensure that people receive some degree of decent, humane treatment. Because political systems that protect human rights are thought to reduce the threat of world conflict, all nations have a stake in promoting worldwide respect for human rights.[8] International human rights law, humanitarian intervention law and refugee law all protect the right to life and physical integrity and attempt to limit the unrestrained power of the state. These laws aim to preserve humanity and protect against anything that challenges people's health, economic well-being, social stability and political peace. 


The right to social security is the right to access and maintain benefits, whether in cash or in kind and without discrimination in order to secure protection.

Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.






Reference list

Maise, M., (2004)
Graham, A., (2014)
Children's Right Alliance( 2015)





























Biyernes, Nobyembre 3, 2017

Eutanasya










        Ano ang Eutanasya?


             
      Ang Eutanasya (Ingles: euthanasia) o Mercy Killing ay ang pagpapatiwakal ng isang indibidwal na nagnanais ng wakasan ang sariling buhay sa tulong ng ibang tao. Ito ay maaaring makatulong sa isang indibidwal na wala ng pisikal na kapasidad na isagawa ang pagpapakamatay dahil sa matinding karamdaman. Ang karaniwang tumutulong sa pagsasagawa ng isang eutanasya ay isang miyembro ng pamilya o doktor. Ang eutanasya ay isang moral at pampolitikang isyu sa maraming bansa, tulad ng kinasangkutang iskandalo ng doktor na si Dr. Jack Kevorkian, isang doktor na tagapagtaguyod ng karapatan ng mga taong nagnanais magpakamatay sa pamamagitan ng eutanasya. Dahil sa pagsasagawa ni Dr. Kevorkian ng eutanasya sa ilang pasyente, siya ay nahatulang mabilanggo sa kulungan. Ang ganitong pamamaraan ay hindi pinapayagan o hindi legal dito sa ating bansa. Ngunit may mga bansa na legal o pwede ang mga ganitong gawain. Halimbawa na lamang ay ang bansang Switzerland kung saan ang bansang ito ay dinarayo ng mga indibidwal mula sa ibang bansa na nagnanais na magpakamatay sa pamamagitan ng Euthanasia.








          Mayroong panuka­lang batas ukol sa “mercy killing” o ang tinatawag na Euthanasia Bill pero nalalambu­ngan pa rin ito ng ulap dahil sa maraming isyu — emotional, legal at pangrelihiyong usapin. Isasagawa lamang ang Euthanasia kapag ang taong may mabigat na sakit ay hiniling sa doctor ganoon din sa kanyang mga kamag-anak na kitilin na ang kanyang buhay. Gayunpaman ma­rami ang nagsasabing mas mabuti ang euthanasia sapagkat natata­himik na ang tao kaysa hayaang buhay na nahihirapan.Isa sa mga paraan ng pagsasagawa ng Euthanasia ay ang pag-aalis sa support o ang pag-aalis ng medical treatment. Mahirap magdesis­yon para sa pamilya ng pasyente. Nagbibigay ito ng pagkabahala at hindi malaman ng ba­wat isa kung tama bang kitilin na ang buhay ng pasyente. Mayroong  iba na hindi itinutuloy ang balak at hinaha­yaan na lamang ang pasyente sa sitwas-yong nakaratay ito at hintayin ang oras. Mahirap ang isyung ito kaya naman dapat magkaroon ng ugnayan ang Philippine Medical Association, Department of Health at Department of Justice, kasama ang mga mam­babatas para ma-dissect at maplantsa ang isyu sa Euthanasia.





Ano ang sinasabi ng Bibliya tungkol sa Euthanasia?

       Ang euthanasia o ang pagpapaubaya na mamatay ang isang tao dahil sa awa ay isang napakahirap na usapin. May dalawang bagay na mahirap ibalanse tungkol sa isyung ito. Sa isang banda, ayaw natin na ilagay sa ating sariling mga kamay ang buhay ng isang tao at hayaang matapos iyon ng wala sa panahon. Sa isang banda naman, hanggang saan natin hahayaang maghirap ang isang tao at hanggang kailan natin siya hahayaan na lamang na mamatay ng kusa? 
       
     
   Mayroon din ang hindi pumapayag tungkol dito isang halimbawa na ang Simbahang Katoliko. Ayon sa kanila, na ang pisikal na kamatayan ay hindi maaaring hadlangan ng sinuman.Ang Diyos lamang ang may kapamahalaan kung saan at kailan magaganap ang kamatayan ng isang tao. Ang euthanasia ay ang paraan ng tao upang pangunahan ang Diyos. Ang kamatayan ay isang natural na kaganapan. Minsan, pinahihintulutan ng Diyos ang isang tao na magdusa ng mahabang panahaon bago mamatay; sa ibang pagkakataon naman ang paghihirap ng isang tao ay maiksi lamang. Walang taong ikinatutuwa ang pagdurusa, ngunit hindi ito nagbibigay ng karapatan sa tao upang humatol sa kahandaang mamatay ng isang tao. Kadalasan, ang layunin ng Diyos ay nahahayag sa pamamagitan ng paghihirap ng isang tao. May layunin ang Diyos sa buhay mula umpisa hanggang sa katapusan. Ang Diyos lamang ang nakakaalam ng pinakamabuti at laging perpekto ang Kanyang panahon, maging ang panahon ng kamatayan. 
 
          Sa parehong paraan, hindi tayo inuutusan ng Bibliya na gawin ang lahat upang mapanatiling buhay ang isang tao. Kung ang isang tao ay binubuhay na lamang ng mga makina, hindi imoral na patayin na ang mga makina at hayaan na mamatay ang isang tao. Ang ganitong pagdedesisyon ay napakahirap at napakasakit. Hindi madaling sabihin sa isang doktor na alisin na ang mga makinang sumusuporta sa hininga ng isang mahal sa buhay. Hindi natin dapat na tapusin ang buhay ng isang tao ng wala pa sa panahon, ngunit gayun din naman, hindi nararapat na gumawa tayo ng mga ekstra-ordinaryong pamamaraan upang panatilihing buhay ang isang tao. 




    

      Nakakaapekto ito sa pamilya ng namatayan sapagkat ang pagkamatay ng taong dumanas ng euthanasia ay hindi natural at ginawa nalang dahil sa kawalan ng pera, upang hindi na mahihirapan o magdusa pa sa iniindang sakit. 

Sang-ayon ba kami  sa Euthanasia o Mercy killing?
     Sa tingin namin depende sa sitwasyon. Hindi mo naman siguro pababayaan o hahayaan na lamang yung mahal mo sa buhay na gusto pang mabuhay at patuloy paring lumalaban sa kabila ng kanyang nararamdamang sakit. Kung ganyan yung sitwasyon, kahit na siguro ubusin pa lahat ng ari-arian , mapagaling lamang siya at madugtungan pa ang buhay niya, gagawin ko. Pero kung siya na mismo o yung pasyente na mismo ang ayaw lumaban sa sakit niya, wala ring mangyayari kung patuloy mo pa rin syang ipaglalaban.





‘Kamatayan na may dignidad’ binabanggit ng iba na ang bawat tao ay may karapatan sa isang mapayapang kamatayan. Ang mamatay ng tahimik na hindi nagdudusa. 








 Pinagmumulan:

                 Wikipedia Philippines
                 Elicano(2008)
                 Philstar Philippines


                                                              




                                           Maraming Salamat sa Pagbabasa!





Inihinda ng: Group 8


Right to Protection

Right to Protection and Social Security          S ocial security is a fundamental human right recognized by most international ...